The head of Instagram has denied claims that the platform can be considered “clinically addictive,” as testimony unfolds in a landmark legal case examining the psychological impact of social media use.
Appearing in court, the executive rejected arguments that Instagram’s design intentionally fosters addiction-like behaviors. Lawyers challenging the platform have argued that certain features — including infinite scrolling, algorithm-driven feeds, and notification systems — are engineered to maximize user engagement in ways that may negatively affect mental health, particularly among teenagers.
The case is being closely watched as it could shape future regulations governing digital platforms. Plaintiffs allege that social media companies knowingly designed products that encourage compulsive usage patterns, contributing to anxiety, depression, and other mental health concerns. Company representatives, however, maintain that the platform provides tools for user control, including time limits, content moderation features, and parental supervision options.
Industry analysts say the outcome could influence how courts define “addiction” in the context of technology. While behavioral scientists continue to debate whether excessive social media use meets clinical criteria for addiction, lawmakers in several countries are considering stricter oversight of digital platforms.
The proceedings highlight growing global scrutiny of tech companies and their responsibility toward user well-being. As debates intensify around digital ethics and platform accountability, the case may establish important legal precedents for how social media companies are regulated in the future.
